Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: Kojiro » 29 lis 2018, 22:42
Kojiro
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: seba82 » 30 lis 2018, 20:17
Czyli faktycznie ukradli umowę, rzekomo fabrykując ją, ale dowodów na fabrykację póki co brak.Ronaldo's new defense attorney in Las Vegas claims that the documents from which DER SPIEGEL has quoted were evidently "stolen" by hackers and "significant portions" of them "were altered and/or completely fabricated." He has not, however, offered any evidence to back up that claim, nor has he presented affidavits from the lawyers who were involved at the time -- or from Ronaldo.
Wyciekły też nowe wersje tego kwestionariusza, zmienione celowo(czy przez prawników czy hakerów to zdecyduje sąd):On Aug. 3, 2009, California lawyer Jay Lavely prepared a 41-page PDF with the title: "Questions for Client." The next day, he sent it to his colleagues Smith and Osório de Castro.
In an email, Lavely warned against having Ronaldo fill out the questionnaire himself. "It is very important that neither the client nor his cousin or brother-in-law should write any memos, notes, emails (or anything else in writing) in answering any of the questions which we send to you. That should be done verbally either by telephone or in face to face meetings. The attorneys should be the ones who memorialize, in writing, the answers to the questions. (...) Otherwise, anything written by the client about the incident or related matters (...) may be discoverable in any legal action that is filed."
Question: "What was said by you and what was said by Ms. C? (This is particularly important if anything was said about having sex or anything like that)"
In the September version, X says: "She said it was not proper to have sex, since they just met ('Better not. It's the first time.') But even so, she grabbed my dick."
In the December version, however, the answer from X was merely: "S he grabbed my penis."
Question: " Describe in detail what happened starting with the first physical contact that you had with Ms. C
In the September version, X answers: "I fucked her from the side. She made herself available. She was lying on her side, in bed, and I entered her from behind. It was rough. We didn't change position. 5/7 minutes. She said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available. The whole time it was rough, I turned her onto her side, and it was fast. Maybe she got some bruises when I grabbed her. (...) She didn't want to 'give it to me,' instead she jerked me off. I don't know any more exactly what she said when she was jerking me off. But she kept saying no. 'Don't do it' -- 'I'm not like the others.' I apologized afterwards."
Part of the following passage is written in the third person, which is perhaps a function of Ronaldo's lawyer having written down the answers for him:
"They didn't use a condom. They didn't talk about condoms. He didn't come inside of her. He pulled his dick out before. I came on her and on the blanket. There was no lubricant. I used saliva. He doesn't know if she had an orgasm."
In the December version, X says: "She was laying in the bed. I went from behind. We did not switch positions. It was 5/7 minutes. It was rough. She didn't complain, she didn't scream, she didn't call for help or anything like that. We didn't use condoms. We didn't even mention it. I did not come inside. I came "on her" (not "in her") and in the blankets. There was no artificial lubrication. I used some saliva. Can't tell if she had or not an orgasm."
Question: "Did Ms. C ever raise her voice, scream, or yell?"
September: "She said no and stop several times."
December: "No."
Question: "Did Ms. C say anything after you had sexual intercourse?"
September: "Afterwards, she said: 'You asshole, you forced me. You idiot. I'm not like the others.' I said, 'I'm sorry.'"
December: "No."
[/quote]Reprints: How To License SPIEGEL Articles
On Oct. 10, Schertz submitted a request to the district court of Hamburg for "the issuance of a preliminary injunction." His goal was that of prohibiting DER SPIEGEL from reporting on "an intended civil complaint due to an alleged rape committed by the applicant." In the request, he also wrote that if the DER SPIEGEL article were to quote from "alleged statements" made by Ronaldo to his lawyers, it should be noted that Ronaldo "never made such a statement as quoted by DER SPIEGEL."
A court memorandum from Oct. 15 notes that Schertz was informed over the phone that the DER SPIEGEL stories about Ronaldo did not represent "unlawful reporting on unproven claims."
In reply, Schertz sent the court a message containing just a single sentence: "Pertaining to the legal matter Ronaldo./.SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co. KG 324O471/18, we herewith withdraw our application for a preliminary injunction."
seba82
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: panmechiko » 30 lis 2018, 22:09
panmechiko
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: Delpiero14 » 30 lis 2018, 22:15
Delpiero14
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: wloski » 30 lis 2018, 22:38
Spójrz na Waszą "9" od trzech sezonów ukrywa się w pasach, bo podobno wyszczuplają.panmechiko pisze:Jaka ironia losu, że Ronaldo trafił do drużyny, która swoje mecze rozgrywa w pasiaku.
wloski
panmechiko
Kojiro
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: seba82 » 10 sty 2019, 20:47
seba82
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: Tomusmc » 10 sty 2019, 21:04
Tomusmc
seba82
Salas11
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: ozob » 10 sty 2019, 21:19
ozob
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: Tomusmc » 10 sty 2019, 21:25
Tomusmc
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: Chlopaczek » 10 sty 2019, 21:26
W ktora strone?ozob pisze:Przeciez wiadome jest, ze stosunek w te czy w te strone byl.
Chlopaczek
Post Wyświetl pojedynczy post autor: ozob » 10 sty 2019, 21:43
ozob
Wróć do „Piłka nożna na świecie”
Technologię dostarcza phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
Polski pakiet językowy dostarcza phpBB.pl
Zasady ochrony danych osobowych | Regulamin
Administracja, zarządzanie i wsparcie graficzne forum: pawel.studio